Through June, hiring in the United States slowed slightly from its pre-pandemic levels.
According to data released by the BLS on Friday, the economy added 372,000 nonfarm payroll positions in February. A consensus of Bloomberg economists predicted a gain of 268,000 jobs in June. Since May’s growth was revised downward, from 390,000 to 384,000, the current increase indicates a slight deceleration.
Previously reported April job growth of 436,000 was revised down to a total gain of 368,000 payrolls.
According to the data, the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 3.6%. To a significant extent, economists anticipated no change in the rate during the month. Due to the high demand for workers, the unemployment rate has remained at historically low levels since 2022.
When it came to job growth in June, educational and healthcare services providers were in the forefront, adding 96,000 positions. The next largest sector to add jobs was the business services sector, at 74,000. Sixty-seven thousand new employment were created in the leisure and hospitality sector, with the restaurant and drinking-place sector contributing 41,000. There are snags in the system that are causing a lack of homes across the country, and the loss of 4,500 employment in the residential building sector highlights this. The electronics industry, the furniture industry, warehouse clubs, and the federal government all saw a decrease in their employee counts.
High loan rates are a contributing factor in the slowdown in job growth seen this year compared to previous. In June, the Federal Reserve hiked its benchmark rate by 0.75 percentage points. This was the first increase in this rate since 1994. Higher interest rates reduce consumer spending because they increase the cost of borrowing money. High demand for labor is projected to persist into the summer, despite the fact that rising rates tend to dampen employers’ aspirations to hire.
“Hiring remains red hot” despite the economic slowdown, said James Neave, head of data science at the online job board Adzuna. Even though the Federal Reserve has threatened to raise interest rates further, companies that are having trouble finding enough workers to meet demand will likely keep hiring.
A number of other indicators imply that rising interest rates and prices are having an adverse effect on a key factor in the development of new jobs. Unpredictably, in May, Americans cut back on their spending at stores and restaurants for the first time since December. If retail sales keep falling, companies would likely increase hiring at a slower rate to compensate for their decreased profits.
Even though it was predicted that job growth would slow as the economy neared full employment, the most recent numbers show that the labor market is almost back to where it was before the crisis. Payrolls in the country are currently 524,000 short of the total they reported in February 2020. If hiring continues at its current rapid pace through July, the economy will likely reach its previous record-high employment level by the end of the summer.
Both the Biden administration and the Federal Reserve want to see a gradual slowdown continue throughout the rest of 2022. Even as the central bank fights to keep inflation under control, the job market continues to recover strongly. Due to the slowing rate of expansion, the gap between the supply of workers and the demand from businesses is shrinking. Although Fed rate hikes won’t have an immediate impact on consumer prices like gas and groceries, Fed Chair Jerome Powell has emphasized in recent weeks that they will help correct inequalities in the labor market.
Pay data released on Friday indicates that labor demand has dropped just modestly. Earnings increased in June by $0.10, or 0.3%, to $32.08 per hour, in line with projections from economists and slowing from May’s gain of $0.12. Even though the job market is still very tight, the print suggests that wage inflation may be abating.
There were flaws in the report, though. From March, when it was at its highest level since the pandemic began, labor force participation has now dropped to 62.2 percent. A major driver of the labor shortage is the slow recovery of the labor force participation rate, which measures the percentage of the American population that is either employed or actively seeking work. In the coming months, if labor force participation doesn’t increase, the imbalance between supply and demand might expand, causing fresh worries about wage-based inflation.
What’s Your Take?
Like, Share, Comment, Tweet it Out!
ISTHATPORKS TAKE:
With the coming midterms Biden will have the much-needed wind behind his back to win over the house and senate if this keeps up. Food Years Up to Biden. We only have one President at a time and he should be respected, if not for his politics, for his sanity.
D.C. — The Obamas’ return to the White House on Wednesday for the release of their official portraits revived a bipartisan tradition that had languished during the Trump administration.
President Joe Biden greeted former first couple Barack Obama and Michelle Obama with “Barack and Michelle, welcome home” in the East Room.
Since 1965, the White House Historical Association has helped raise funds for the acquisition of presidential and first lady portraits. According to the group, most presidents and first women make art commissions in their final years in office. The finished portraits are then hung in the Oval Office.
It is customary for the current president to host the immediate predecessor during the unveiling of the official portrait. Former president Bill Clinton hosted George H.W. Bush, current president George W. Bush hosted former president Clinton, and current president Barack Obama hosted the younger Bush.
The late President Donald Trump did not hold any sort of unveiling ceremony during his administration. No official statement regarding his decision to not have such a ceremony for the Obamas was made.
The indoor event was postponed even more after Biden took office the previous year owing to the Covid epidemic.
Before this past Wednesday, neither the portraits nor the artists who had been commissioned had been made public. Obama commissioned Robert McCurdy to paint his likeness, while Michelle Obama commissioned Sharon Sprung.
The former president has spoken of his admiration for McCurdy’s work, praising the realism of his subjects. “His work is so precise that a glance it looks like a photograph,” Obama said. Obama stated.
He added, “Presidents so often get airbrushed, even take on a mythical status,” he said. “What I want people to remember about Michelle and me, is presidents and first ladies are human beings like everyone else. We have our gifts and we have our flaws.”
Michelle Obama stressed the significance of tradition and a peaceful transition of power, although she did not directly address Trump by name.
“You see, the people they make their voices heard with their vote. We hold an inauguration to ensure a peaceful transition of power,” she said. “And once our time is up, we move on. And all that remains in this hallowed place are our good efforts. And these portraits, portraits that connect our history to the present day, portraits that hang here as history continues to be made.”
Former Obama administration officials were in attendance, as were Jill Biden, Kamala Harris, and Doug Emhoff as first lady, vice president, and second gentleman, respectively.
Press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked during Tuesday’s briefing whether Biden would perform the same event for Trump should a painting of him be done, but she sent the question to the White House Historical Association.
Officials in Washington — On Wednesday, Vice President Biden announced that the federal government will forgive up to $10,000 in federal student loan debt for millions of Americans, plus an additional $10,000 for low-income borrowers, and extend a pause on monthly payments, providing much-needed relief just weeks before the midterm elections.
Borrowers who make less than $125,000 annually, or less than $250,000 jointly, are eligible for up to $10,000 in loan forgiveness under the program. Allotted exclusively to students with the highest financial need, Pell Grants provide an additional $10,000 in assistance to those who qualify.
“An entire generation is now saddled with unsustainable debt in exchange for an attempt at least at a college degree,” Mr. Biden said in remarks at the White House. “The burden is so heavy that even if you graduate, you may not have access to the middle-class life that the college degree once provided.
“Current students will be eligible for debt relief as well, although future students will not be, according to senior administration officials who explained the details of the plan on a call with reporters. Undergraduate loan payments will also be capped at 5% of monthly income.
Vice President Biden estimated that some 43 million people would benefit from his plan’s debt forgiveness provisions. Ninety percent of these borrowers come from families with annual incomes of less than $75,000, and sixty percent are Pell Grant recipients who are therefore eligible for the $20,000 in cancellation. Nearly 20 million people, according to Mr. Biden, would have their debt completely forgiven.
The president has also prolonged the suspension of student loan payments until the end of the year; according to the Education Department and the president, this will be the final such suspension during a pandemic.
According to the Department of Education, roughly 8 million debtors will have their debt forgiven immediately, while others will need to seek for relief. Mr. Biden has stated that in the upcoming weeks, the Department of Education will make available a brief application for borrowers seeking debt relief. Borrowers can register for updates on the application’s release date, per the Department of Education.
Limits on income will be established for either 2020 or 2021. A senior administration official indicated that individuals and couples will be eligible if their income was less than the limit in either year.
The decision to cancel student loans followed months of debate within the White House about whether or not to do so and at what cost. Student loan forgiveness was a major campaign promise made by Mr. Biden, and Democrats have been pushing the administration to make good on that promise. The Republican Party has stated that Mr. Biden does not have the right to cancel the debt, and his plan will undoubtedly be challenged in court.
The Education Department has issued a document from general counsel Lisa Brown providing legal rationale for Mr. Biden’s actions in light of the impending court battles. According to Brown, the Education Secretary has wide control over financial aid programs in times of national emergency because to the HEROES Act of 2003.
The current circumstances call for the deployment of this authority to “effectuate a campaign of categorical debt cancellation geared at alleviating the financial harms created by the COVID-19 pandemic,” as Brown put it. For borrowers who have suffered financial losses due to the COVID19 epidemic, “the Secretary could waive or amend statutory and regulatory procedures to achieve a limited level of cancellation.”
A study using the Penn Wharton Budget Model estimated a cost of roughly $300 billion in the first year to forgive the first $10,000 of student loan debt for persons earning up to $125,000. More than two-thirds of the debt forgiveness would benefit the top 60% of earnings in the United States, the study showed.
Mr. Biden stated that the plan’s cost could be covered by the savings from earlier deficit reduction initiatives “many times more.” He declared that he “would never apologize for assisting Americans, working Americans, and the middle class.”
However, the poor Debt cancellation for college students has been criticized on the grounds that it won’t help the millions of Americans who didn’t go to college but are nonetheless having trouble making ends meet in the face of historically high inflation. The rising expense of higher education has historically surpassed inflation in recent decades, and even if some student loan debt were forgiven, this would not solve the problem.
Senior administration officials who spoke on a call with reporters claimed that resuming payments on student loans would “roughly outweigh” any impact on inflation from eliminating student debt.
While the Trump administration delayed reimbursements at the start of the outbreak, Vice President Biden has done so four times since taking office. According to a survey from April by the Financial Health Network, with interest rates near zero, federal student loan borrowers are saving over $1.5 billion monthly.
A huge setback for anti-abortion advocates in the post-Roe era, the voters of Kansas rejected an amendment that would have curtailed the right to abortion under the state Constitution.
Voters in Kansas soundly defeated a proposition that would have prohibited both legal abortions and the use of public funds to pay for them.
In Kansas, a “yes” vote on Amendment 2 would have removed constitutional safeguards for abortion, while a “no” vote would have left those provisions in place.
Due to the failure of these ballot initiatives, the Kansas Supreme Court’s 2019 ruling upholding the constitutionality of abortion in the state remains in effect.
In its original form, the amendment read as follows: “Because Kansans appreciate both women and children, the constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government support of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion.”
A simple majority of voters was all that was needed to approve the amendment when it appeared on the ballot as a yes/no question. A little before 9 p.m. local time, Insider and Decision Desk HQ predicted that “no” had won the amendment vote by more than 30 points.
Since the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade in late June, voters in Kansas have been the first in the country to cast a direct vote on abortion rights. Anti-abortion campaigners suffered a devastating setback in Kansas and around the country with the passage of this amendment.
Over the past decade, the constitutions of four other states—Alabama, Louisiana, Tennessee, and West Virginia—have been amended to explicitly prohibit abortion. After Roe v. Wade, those modifications were crucial in limiting access to abortion and paving the way for prohibitions to be implemented.
Voters in Kansas and four other states will decide the legality of abortion in the year 2022. Voters in two blue states, California and Vermont, will decide in November whether to enshrine the right to abortion in the state constitution through constitutional amendments. Voters in Kentucky will decide on a similar measure in November that establishes no right to abortion.
Celebrity, Food Years Up!2 years ago
Celebrity, Food Years Up!2 years ago
celebrity2 years ago
celebrity2 years ago
Hip Hop3 years ago
General News, Pork!3 years ago
Politics3 years ago
General News, Pork!2 years ago