Connect with us

Politics, Pork!

Giuliani a target of Georgia’s 2020 election probe …another Trump supporter? NO!

Never Pork

Published

on

Embed from Getty Images

August 15-  On Monday, former president Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani revealed that he is a target in a criminal investigation in Georgia looking into attempts by Trump and his allies to change the election results in 2020.

A judge has ordered Giuliani to appear before a special grand jury in Fulton County on Wednesday to answer questions about his dealings with the 9/11 commission.

Giuliani added that Atlanta is “well known for corruption” and that the inquiry is politically motivated on his regular talk show on WABC radio in New York.

The New York Times first reported the news, attributing their information to Giuliani’s attorney, Robert Costello.

Costello told Reuters that prosecutors notified Giuliani’s attorneys on Monday afternoon that their client was a target. He claimed that if asked any questions about Trump that would violate attorney-client privilege, Giuliani would refuse to answer.

In December of 2020, Giuliani echoed Trump’s unfounded claims about stolen ballots in front of state legislators, pushing them to not certify Democratic President Joe Biden’s election.

Following the release of a taped phone call from January 2021 in which Trump pushed the senior election official in the state to “find” enough votes to change the outcome, an investigation was launched in Fulton County. Former President Obama has often claimed, inaccurately, that he won the 2020 presidential election and the state of Georgia.

In May, at the request of county DA Fani Willis, a special grand jury was formed in part to take advantage of the grand jury’s subpoena power.

The grand jury issued subpoenas to many Trump advisers and lawyers last month, including former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and current South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham. Giuliani has a long history of battling crime as a U.S. Attorney and as mayor of New York City.

On Monday, a federal court ordered Graham to appear in front of the grand jury regarding his communications with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who was the recipient of Trump’s call in January 2021.

U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May wrote “The court finds that the District Attorney has shown extraordinary circumstances and a special need for Senator Graham’s testimony on issues relating to alleged attempts to influence or disrupt the lawful administration of Georgia’s 2022 elections,” 

Graham issued a statement saying he will be appealing the ruling since he made the calls as part of his constitutionally protected legislative duties.

Prosecutors have said in court documents that Graham made phone calls “definitely appear interrelated” with Trump’s efforts to change the election’s outcome by reexamining absentee votes.

Numerous investigations investigating Trump’s actions are underway. A legislative commission is looking into both the Georgia case and the attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters on January 6, 2021, to determine whether or not he was involved in either.

His Florida mansion was raided by the FBI last week after he was accused of stealing top-secret paperwork from the White House. In a search warrant made public on Friday, federal agents said they were looking into suspected violations of the Espionage Act and other statutes.

If Trump overstated the value of his enterprises, New York’s attorney general’s office and the Manhattan district attorney’s office are looking into it both civilly and criminally.

Last week, Trump refused to answer questions from the New York attorney general’s office, claiming that doing so would violate his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

What’s Your Take ?

Like, Share, Comment, Tweet It Out!

“It’s Your World, You Decide if This Is Pork Or Not!”

ISTHATPORKS TAKE:

We predicted a long time ago that anyone connected to Donald Trump is going down or at the least is gonna have a lot of turbulence in their daily activities. Giuliani's praise that he was America's Mayor seemed like a lifetime ago. After all is said and done no one will remember that the Rudy of 2001 was his finest moment in the same way no one remembers OJ. Simpson's celebrated football career was his. The moment that eclipsed Rudy's Mayor moment of 2001 was and is his PORK moments with Donald Trump. In that game, we think he will lose but win, lose or draw Rudy will never be the same because when generations change and look back at these times, he will be the cautionary tale of a person who lived, but traveled too close to the sun of common sense and got burned because he didn't have his shades on.

Continue Reading

Politics, Pork!

Nancy Pelosi’s husband ‘violently attacked’ by assailant hunting for her.

Never Pork

Published

on

Embed from Getty Images

On Oct. 28 (UPI) — Her office sent a statement on Friday saying that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, had been attacked by a home invader.

At a press conference held by the San Francisco Police Department, the suspect, 42-year-old David Depape, was named as the attacker. According to Sgt. William Scott, when police arrived, they saw Depape with a hammer and Paul Pelosi, 82, holding onto it.

Then, Depape took the hammer from Paul Pelosi and started hitting him with it until police arrived and took him into custody.

According to reports from CNN, NBC, and the New York Times, citing unnamed law enforcement officials, the assailant entered the couple’s San Francisco home early on Friday morning looking for the Speaker.

After being arrested, Depape was taken into custody and lodged in the San Francisco County Jail on “many other felony” counts, including attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse, burglary, and more.

“Where is Nancy? Where is Nancy,” the assailant asked Paul Pelosi, according to the sources.

Pelosi’s husband, Paul, was “violently assaulted,” according to a statement released by Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., through spokesman Drew Hammill.

“The attacker is currently in police custody, and the circumstances surrounding the attack are being probed. Mr. Pelosi has been hospitalized and is receiving top-notch care; he is anticipated to make a full recovery “the report indicated.

According to Hammill, Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi was not in the Bay Area at the time.

The Speaker and her family “request privacy at this time” and “express gratitude to the first responders and medical personnel involved.”

Forensics in San Francisco At 2:27 a.m. PDT, according to Sergeant Adam Lobsinger, police were called to the Pelosi home. Paul Pelosi was rushed to the hospital, and the suspect was taken into jail.

Vice President Joe Biden issued the following statement through White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre:

“The president is praying for Paul Pelosi and for Speaker Pelosi’s whole family. This morning he called Speaker Pelosi to express his support after this horrible attack. He is also very glad that a full recovery is expected. The president continues to condemn all violence and asks that the family’s desire for privacy be respected.”

What’s Your Take?

Like, Share, Comment, Tweet it Out!

“It’s Your World, You Decide!”

Continue Reading

Politics, Pork!

Kari Lake Won’t Say If She’ll Accept Arizona Election Results If She Loses

Never Pork

Published

on

If she loses to Democrat Katie Hobbs in Arizona on November 8, Republican gubernatorial contender Kari Lake has declined to declare if she will accept defeat.

Lake refused to accept the election results many times when asked by CNN’s “State of the Union” moderator Dana Bash on Sunday. Lake insisted that she was going to win the election.

Lake declared,  “I’m going to win the election, and I will accept that result,” simultaneously saying that Hobbs was a racist.

Bash questioned Lake, “If you lose, will you accept that?” throughout the conversation.

Lake repeated, “I’m going to win the election, and I will accept that results.”

Originally, on October 12, Arizona PBS was going to have a televised discussion between Lake and Hobbs, but Hobbs bowed out, claiming that Lake was “just interested in making a spectacle” and labeling Lake a “conspiracy theorist.”

“Kari Lake has made it clear time and time again that she’s not interested in having substantive, in depth conversations about the issues that matter to Arizonians,” Hobbs told Bash on Sunday’s CNN broadcast. “She only wants a scenario where she can control the dialogue, and she’s refused to sit down in a one-on-one lengthy conversation to really clarify with Arizonians where she is on the issues.”

After the Arizona Citizens Clean Election Commission, which had collaborated with PBS to host the debate, backed out, Arizona PBS had planned to interview Lake this Wednesday instead of holding the debate.

Lake has worked with Fox News before. At present, Hobbs is Arizona’s Secretary of State. On Thursday, a Fox 10 Phoenix/InsiderAdvantage survey showed that Lake had a four-point lead over Hobbs in the campaign for governor.

In addition to having the endorsement of the former president, Trump ally and Republican Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga), Lake also has the backing of MyPillow CEO and conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell.

She also helps promote Trump’s false allegations that significant voter fraud occurred in the 2020 election, despite the fact that the Justice Department has found no evidence to support such accusations.

According to Lake, both Trump and Florida’s Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, have “BDE,” or “big dick energy.”

DeSantis, she continued, “has BDE;” she didn’t know if the audience was familiar with the term. Does anyone have any idea what that means? Ask your kids about it later.”

What’s Your Take?

Like, Share, Comment, Tweet it Out!

“It’s Your World. You Decide!”

Continue Reading

Politics, Pork!

Affidavit: Trump residence search triggered by classified records, obstruction

Never Pork

Published

on

  On Friday, the Justice Department issued a partially redacted search warrant affidavit detailing the reasons FBI investigators visited the Florida property of former President Donald Trump this month.

As part of an ongoing criminal investigation into whether or not Trump illegally removed White House records before he left office in 2021, a search was done. In order to safeguard witnesses and the legitimacy of the inquiry, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart mandated the release of the affidavit while allowing for redactions.

Probable cause is stated for both the existence of classified materials at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and for the existence of “evidence of obstruction” there.

The statement also said there was reasonable suspicion that “evidence, contraband, fruits of crime, or other goods illegally possessed” would be located at Trump’s residence.

After leaving office, presidents are obligated to provide the National Archives with a large quantity of paperwork. Since last year, the National Archives and Records Administration has been pestering Trump to return documents that belong in the archives.

On Friday, an affidavit was made public claiming that federal officials suspected Trump was hiding secret materials after reviewing several boxes of Trump’s donated records to the archives. Several of the papers contained the “HSC” marks that denote top secret information.

According to the affidavit, the National Archives sent the case to the FBI in February. The FBI wanted to know who took the documents from the White House without permission, how they got there, and if Mar-a-Lago was a legitimate storage facility.

There are many potential violations of federal law listed in the affidavit, including a law that makes it illegal to steal materials relevant to national defense and not return them to the United States government. Any person who violates 18 U.S.C. 793 (e) is subject to a 10-year prison sentence and penalties.

The affidavit also refers to 18 U.S.C. 1519, which provides that anybody who obstructs justice may be subject to a fine and/or imprisonment of up to 20 years.

According to the affidavit, the government made numerous attempts to obtain the files months before the search was conducted.

On June 8th, the government addressed a letter to Trump’s legal team reiterating that “Mar-a-Lago does not have a safe place permitted for the preservation of sensitive material.” All White House items and the secure location where they are being housed were requested in the letter.

The New York Times, CNN, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal, among others, had requested that Reinhart unseal the search papers in the interest of openness and transparency.

The Justice Department persuaded Reinhart, he said on Thursday, that certain parts of the affidavit should remain sealed because their release would reveal “(1) the identities of witnesses, law enforcement agents, and uncharged parties, (2) the investigation’s strategy direction, scope, sources, and methods, and (3) grand jury information.”

According to Reinhart’s analysis, the government proved its case that the withheld information is little and necessary to safeguard the operation.

What’s Your Take?

Like, Share, Comment, Tweet it Out!

“It’s Your World, You Decide!”

Continue Reading

Trending